Lance Armstrong

Let me start by saying I don’t know the truth about this whole Lance Armstrong thing.  I suspect only Lance, and a select few of his crew, know the actual truth, but like everyone else I’m not going to let that stop me from spouting my opinion on the matter.

If you don’t know what I’m talking about, Lance Armstrong was stripped, yesterday, of his seven Tour de France victories.

By attempting to enter the Tour de France, once more, he reopened the statute of limitations in his drug inquiry and faced more investigation and court time.

He decided it was not worth the battle and quit, saying he would not fight the inquiry and thereby forfeited his victories.

Since then there’s been quite the buzz, both from fans and critics.  This morning I woke to a Facebook post expressing dismay and eight subsequent comments voicing their support for Lance and ire against the evil sports establishment.  Here was my reply:

“Really guys? If he was clean he would still be fighting this. Face it, professional sports at this level demands some form of doping. It’s the great hypocrisy of sport. I don’t blame him so much for doping (even though I think it’s cheating) as I do the soap box and outright lying to the public.”

Over the years I’ve had the chance to meet and work with athletes from a variety of sports at a variety of levels.  Steroid use, doping and other forms of enhancement inevitably find their way into conversation.

I know athletes who use, some who did and now don’t, and others who say they never have and never will.  What’s of general consensus is, it works.  What’s of debate — whether or not they should be used.

The “hypocrisy of sport” is as spectators we expect our athletes to perform at levels that demand enhancement.  We didn’t start doping, competition and the desire to win at all costs own that, but like any junky, once we got a taste, we wanted more.

Like modern day gladiators our athletes know that while their sport may be the vehicle of their success, pleasing the crowd is how they maintain it.  Many are willing to do that to the detriment of their own health.  Those who are not, we don’t even know about any more.

I don’t think Lance is a bad person.  LiveStrong has been a highly beneficial charity and I commend Lance for the work he’s done, the inspiration he’s provided to cancer sufferers.  I don’t blame him for doping.  Personally, I think it’s cheating, but I understand the realities of sport that demand it.

But, what about us?  What’s our need to build someone else up, to place them so high on a pedestal they can’t help but fall.

How would our lives be different if we became our own heroes?  Rather than waiting for someone else to come along and do amazing things, why not take initiative and be amazing ourselves?

Stay strong.


Filed under Fitness, Motivation, Personal Development, Personal Training, Recovery, Strength, Strength Training

2 responses to “Lance Armstrong

  1. There is so much in this story.
    First, let’s make it clear the organization that “stripped” Armstrong of his titles may have no authority to do so. I’ll wait to hear what the Tour de France people have to say. Do all members of the US Tour team submit samples for testing to the USADA? Do they certifiy a clean team?

    Anyway, personally I believe Lance doped. More and more it appears that those athletes who accomplish great things for very long periods of time, or improve as they get older are doping. The evidence just points in that direction. That said, I know there will never be definitive proof one way or the other.

    The LiveStrong foundation appears to be doing fabulous work – a closer look revealed they were as good at PR and as poor at actually helping folks as the Komen people (and I believe both organizations work side by side a lot). So I don’t personally support it. Don’t buy pink products or wear yellow bands. But that’s another story….

    • Thanks, Deb. I appreciate your comments. I agree about the TdF, it will be interesting to see what the French do in response to this, but I still think our own attitudes towards “enhanced” athletics is the real issue. Clearly we want our athletes to perform at a level that demands some form of enhancement, we just don’t want to know about it and when we do we reserve the right to cry “Foul!” Just like in Ancient Rome, lives our ruined for our entertainment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s